Growth trajectories of self-concept and interest in mathematics and language – Individual differences and cross-domain relations

Anna Widlund*, Markku Niemivirta, Heta Tuominen, Johan Korhonen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Motivational beliefs seem to decline for many during adolescence. Although this may reflect a mismatch between students' needs and the secondary schools' resources, general declines may also stem from increased dimensional comparison processes: students’ motivational beliefs tend to become increasingly domain-specific during adolescence. Yet, inter- and intraindividual differences in students' co-developmental processes of self-concept and interest across domains have rarely been studied.

Aim
This study examined what kinds of developmental trajectories of self-concept and interest in mathematics and L1 can be identified among adolescents across lower-secondary education, and whether trajectories and cross-domain relations differ between genders.

Sample
We followed 612 students across Grades 7–9 (13–15-year-olds).

Methods
Growth mixture models were applied to identify distinct motivational trajectories of math and L1 self-concept and interest across Grades 7–9. Multi-group growth models were used to compare growth trajectories and cross-domain relations between genders.

Results
Students’ development in math and L1 motivation were rather homogenous across grades 7–9, and many experienced declines in their motivation after entering Grade 7. Yet, there was a clear differentiation across domains among girls: their L1 motivation was significantly higher than their math motivation. For both boys and girls, several negative cross-domain relations between math and L1 motivation were detected.

Conclusion
The findings should be considered when supporting students' motivation in schools. Dimensional comparisons coupled with gendered stereotypes may unnecessarily hinder some students from engaging in math and aspiring for math-related career alternatives, despite having high performance in math.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101882
Number of pages11
JournalLearning and Instruction
Volume91
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Cite this