Peter Winch and the Autonomy of the Social Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article offers a reassessment of the main import of Peter Winch’s philosophy of the social sciences. Critics argue that Winch presented a flawed methodology for the social sciences, while his supporters deny that Winch’s work is about methodology at all. Contrary to both, the author argues that Winch deals with fundamental questions about methodology, and that there is something substantial to learn from his account. Winch engages methodological questions without being committed to social ontology. Instead, Winch’s work on methodology is best described as a descriptive metaphysics of social inquiry. This alternative reading clarifies the close link between Winch’s argument for the autonomy of the social sciences and R. G. Collingwood’s philosophy of history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-174
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peter Winch and the Autonomy of the Social Sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this