First Partner Choice in a Native Minority: The Role of Own and Parental Ethnolinguistic Affiliation

Caroline Uggla*, Jan Saarela

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite increasing diversity within many societies, ethnically endogamous unions remain common. In contexts where one ethnic minority has lived alongside the majority for centuries, understanding who partners with whom is central to understanding how ethnic boundaries are maintained or dissolved. This study examines the role of own and parental ethnolinguistic affiliation for the first partner choice in Finland. We provide a unique test of the relevance of ethnic endogamy across two generations, in a context where both groups are native, but one (Finnish speakers) overwhelmingly outnumbers the other (Swedish speakers). Using register data on the total population, we examine how a person’s ethnolinguistic affiliation and background affect the choice of the first cohabiting partner in terms of the partner’s ethnolinguistic affiliation and background. We apply discrete-time competing risk models for men and women born 1970–1983. Results indicate that Swedish-registered individuals with two Swedish-registered parents are, by far, the most likely to partner with another Swedish-registered person with endogamous background. Partnering with a Swedish-registered person with exogamous background is most likely among individuals who themselves come from mixed unions. Patterns are remarkably consistent across gender, and adjustments for education and residential area only marginally alter the results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3
JournalEuropean Journal of Population
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First Partner Choice in a Native Minority: The Role of Own and Parental Ethnolinguistic Affiliation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this