When who and how matter: explaining the success of referendums in Europe

Nanuli Silagadze, Sergiu Gherghina

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

9 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

This article aims to identify the institutional factors that make a referendum successful. This comparative analysis seeks to explain the success of top-down referendums organized in Europe between 2001 and 2013. It argues and tests for the main effect of three institutional factors (popularity of the initiator, size of parliamentary majority, and political cues during referendum campaigns) and controls for the type of referendum and voter turnout. The analysis uses data collected from referendums and electoral databases, public opinion surveys, and newspaper articles. Results show that referendums proposed by a large parliamentary majority or with clear messages from political parties during campaign are likely to be successful.

OriginalspråkOdefinierat/okänt
Sidor (från-till)905-922
Antal sidor17
TidskriftComparative European Politics
Volym16
Utgåva5
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2018
MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

Nyckelord

  • referendum, direct democracy, success,party cues

Citera det här