Vulnerabilisation: Between mainstreaming and human rights overreach

Viljam Engström*, Mikaela Heikkilä, Maija Mustaniemi-Laakso

*Korresponderande författare för detta arbete

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

    11 Citeringar (Scopus)
    69 Nedladdningar (Pure)


    There is an ongoing process of ‘vulnerabilisation’ of international protection. This process is the outcome of the establishment of special protection regimes within human rights law and of extending and specifying the scope of existing norms. Vulnerabilisation also increasingly takes place through the expansion of the sphere of international actors embedding the protection of vulnerable groups as a core element of their policymaking. This article takes hold of this ongoing vulnerabilisation and sets out to explore some of its consequences. Vulnerabilisation, the article claims, is a necessary and important element of ensuring protection of those most in need. However, the development also comes with possible downsides. Vulnerability-reasoning enables selectivity and prioritisation, which can turn into exclusion and politicisation. The vulnerabilisation phenomenon also comes with compartmentalisation and potential instrumentalisation of protection. As such, vulnerabilisation walks a tightrope between mainstreaming and overreach.
    Sidor (från-till)118-136
    Antal sidor19
    TidskriftNetherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
    StatusPublicerad - 2022
    MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad


    • vulnerability
    • Mänskliga rättigheter
    • special protection

    Citera det här