The Good and Bad in Sexual Relations: A Reconsideration of Winch’s Limiting Notions

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/konferenshandlingKapitelVetenskapligPeer review

Sammanfattning

At the end of his influential article “Understanding a Primitive Society” (1964), Peter Winch suggests that sexual relations, together with birth and death, are not to be considered as events or experiences in the world, but rather as having a more fundamental role in shaping what we make sense of as human life and morality. In this article, I discuss some senses in which sexual relations, perceived as such a “limiting notion”, can be said to “determine the ‘ethical space’ within which the possibilities of good and evil in human life can be exercised” (Winch 1964, 322). I argue first that sexual relations, understood in a broad sense to include both sexual desire and the possibility of forming intimate relationships, as well as an understanding of ourselves as in some way sexed or gendered, interestingly differ from the other limiting notions of birth and death, in that they by necessity involve us in (desired, imagined or actualized) encounters with other human beings. Through a discussion of Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts (2015), I then consider the ethical character of such encounters, to show how varying and conflicting conceptions about sexual morality, and to some extent, politics, in our present society, reveal forms of disagreement that go deep with us.
OriginalspråkEngelska
Titel på gästpublikationEthics, Society and Politics
Undertitel på gästpublikationThemes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch
RedaktörerMichael Campbell, Lynette Read
UtgivningsortCham
FörlagSpringer
Sidor199-215
Antal sidor17
ISBN (elektroniskt)978-3-030-40742-1
ISBN (tryckt)978-3-030-40741-4
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 8 jun 2020
MoE-publikationstypA3 Del av bok eller annan forskningsbok

Publikationsserier

NamnNordic Wittgenstein Studies
FörlagSpringer Nature Switzerland
Volym6

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”The Good and Bad in Sexual Relations: A Reconsideration of Winch’s Limiting Notions”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här