TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing teachers’ classroom communication skills – Measuring the effect of a continued professional development programme for mainstream school teachers
AU - Andersson, Ketty
AU - Sandgren, Olof
AU - Rosqvist, Ida
AU - Lyberg Åhlander, Viveka
AU - Hansson, Kristina
AU - Sahlén, Birgitta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Continued professional development (CPD), tailored to teachers’ needs and expectations, is required for updated skills and knowledge. In this study, twenty-five teachers working with first and second grade students participated in an 11-week programme focusing on enhancing classroom communication. The participating teachers were randomly assigned to either a direct intervention track (intervention) or a delayed intervention track (waiting control). Teachers’ perceptions of activities and interactions in the classroom and self-efficacy were assessed on three occasions: T1, T2, and T3. The direct intervention track received intervention between T1 and T2, while the delayed intervention track received intervention between T2 and T3. A percentage change score for changes between T1 and T2 was calculated, to compare the direct and delayed intervention tracks and assess any intervention effect. Results revealed no significant difference between the groups, i.e., the intervention had no effect on teacher self-reports. The teachers gave an overall positive evaluation of the CPD. Thematic analyses revealed continued need for professional development and insights into the reciprocal influence of student and teacher behaviour. The quantitative and qualitative results paint somewhat different pictures showing the need of mixed methods when analysing these kinds of data.
AB - Continued professional development (CPD), tailored to teachers’ needs and expectations, is required for updated skills and knowledge. In this study, twenty-five teachers working with first and second grade students participated in an 11-week programme focusing on enhancing classroom communication. The participating teachers were randomly assigned to either a direct intervention track (intervention) or a delayed intervention track (waiting control). Teachers’ perceptions of activities and interactions in the classroom and self-efficacy were assessed on three occasions: T1, T2, and T3. The direct intervention track received intervention between T1 and T2, while the delayed intervention track received intervention between T2 and T3. A percentage change score for changes between T1 and T2 was calculated, to compare the direct and delayed intervention tracks and assess any intervention effect. Results revealed no significant difference between the groups, i.e., the intervention had no effect on teacher self-reports. The teachers gave an overall positive evaluation of the CPD. Thematic analyses revealed continued need for professional development and insights into the reciprocal influence of student and teacher behaviour. The quantitative and qualitative results paint somewhat different pictures showing the need of mixed methods when analysing these kinds of data.
KW - classroom language and communication
KW - continued professional development
KW - inter-disciplinary collaboration
KW - intervention
KW - mixed methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122316645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/02656590211070997
DO - 10.1177/02656590211070997
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122316645
SN - 0265-6590
VL - 38
SP - 166
EP - 179
JO - Child Language Teaching and Therapy
JF - Child Language Teaching and Therapy
IS - 2
ER -