Återgå till huvudnavigering Återgå till sök Gå direkt till huvudinnehållet

Emotional engagement and perceived empathy in live vs. automated psychological interviews

  • Thomas J. Nyman*
  • , Anna Karin Noromies
  • , Francesco Pompedda
  • , Pekka Santtila
  • , Jan Antfolk
  • *Korresponderande författare för detta arbete

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikelVetenskapligPeer review

1 Citeringar (Scopus)
9 Nedladdningar (Pure)

Sammanfattning

In clinical in-person conditions, social presence, perceived empathy, and emotional engagement are related to positive outcomes. In online settings, it is unclear how these factors affect outcomes. Here, in 10–15-minute interviews, we investigated the influence of automation. Participants (N=75) engaged in one of three possible interviews: live semi-scripted, live scripted, or video scripted. In the first two, participants communicated with a live interviewer and, in the third, with pre-recorded interviewer questions and answers. Emotion recognition software revealed that expressed joy differed between conditions (χ2(2) = 18.08, p<.001); both live conditions had higher scores (vs. video scripted). Self-rated perceived interviewer empathy also differed between conditions in the same way (F[2, 72] = 9.445, p<0.001). We found a positive correlation between perceived empathy and expressed joy (r=.35; p<.01). In sum, automatized interviews differed in perceived empathy and expressed emotion compared with live interviews.

OriginalspråkEngelska
Artikelnummere0323490
TidskriftPLOS ONE
Volym20
Nummer5 May
DOI
StatusPublicerad - maj 2025
MoE-publikationstypA1 Tidskriftsartikel-refererad

Fingeravtryck

Fördjupa i forskningsämnen för ”Emotional engagement and perceived empathy in live vs. automated psychological interviews”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här