TY - JOUR
T1 - Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton
T2 - Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
AU - Listmann, Luisa
AU - Hattich, Giannina S.I.
AU - Matthiessen, Birte
AU - Reusch, Thorsten B.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The basic grant proposal supporting this work was written by BM and TR. The experiment was developed by GH and then the experiments further designed by LL and GH. Lab work carried out by LL and GH and data analyses by LL. LL, GH, BM, and TR drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.
Funding Information:
LL, GH and this project were funded by the DFG priority program 1704 Dynatrait: TR RE1708/17-1 and 2 and BM MA5058/2-1 and 2.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Listmann, Hattich, Matthiessen and Reusch.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/31
Y1 - 2020/7/31
N2 - How ecological and evolutionary processes interact and together determine species and community responses to climate change is poorly understood. We studied long-term dynamics (over approximately 200 asexual generations) in two phytoplankton species, a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diatom (Chaetoceros affinis), to increased CO2 growing alone, or competing with one another in co-occurrence. To allow for rapid evolutionary responses, the experiment started with a standing genetic variation of nine genotypes in each of the species. Under co-occurrence of both species, we observed a dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi after about 120 generations in both CO2 treatments, but more pronounced under high CO2. Associated with this shift, we only found weak adaptation to high CO2 in the diatom and none in the coccolithophore in terms of species’ growth rates. In addition, no adaptation to interspecific competition could be observed by comparing the single to the two-species treatments in reciprocal assays, regardless of the CO2 treatment. Nevertheless, highly reproducible genotype sorting left only one genotype remaining for each of the species among all treatments. This strong evolutionary selection coincided with the dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi. Since all other conditions were kept constant over time, the most parsimonious explanation for the dominance shift is that the strong evolutionary selection was driven by the experimental nutrient conditions, and in turn potentially altered competitive ability of the two species. Thus, observed changes in the simplest possible two-species phytoplankton “community” demonstrated that eco-evolutionary interactions can be critical for predicting community responses to climate change in rapidly dividing organisms such as phytoplankton.
AB - How ecological and evolutionary processes interact and together determine species and community responses to climate change is poorly understood. We studied long-term dynamics (over approximately 200 asexual generations) in two phytoplankton species, a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diatom (Chaetoceros affinis), to increased CO2 growing alone, or competing with one another in co-occurrence. To allow for rapid evolutionary responses, the experiment started with a standing genetic variation of nine genotypes in each of the species. Under co-occurrence of both species, we observed a dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi after about 120 generations in both CO2 treatments, but more pronounced under high CO2. Associated with this shift, we only found weak adaptation to high CO2 in the diatom and none in the coccolithophore in terms of species’ growth rates. In addition, no adaptation to interspecific competition could be observed by comparing the single to the two-species treatments in reciprocal assays, regardless of the CO2 treatment. Nevertheless, highly reproducible genotype sorting left only one genotype remaining for each of the species among all treatments. This strong evolutionary selection coincided with the dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi. Since all other conditions were kept constant over time, the most parsimonious explanation for the dominance shift is that the strong evolutionary selection was driven by the experimental nutrient conditions, and in turn potentially altered competitive ability of the two species. Thus, observed changes in the simplest possible two-species phytoplankton “community” demonstrated that eco-evolutionary interactions can be critical for predicting community responses to climate change in rapidly dividing organisms such as phytoplankton.
KW - C. affinis
KW - CO
KW - competition
KW - E. huxleyi
KW - eco-evolutionary interaction
KW - ocean acidification
KW - phytoplankton
KW - species interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089801728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089801728
SN - 2296-7745
VL - 7
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
M1 - 634
ER -