When who and how matter: explaining the success of referendums in Europe

Nanuli Silagadze, Sergiu Gherghina

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

10 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

This article aims to identify the institutional factors that make a referendum successful. This comparative analysis seeks to explain the success of top-down referendums organized in Europe between 2001 and 2013. It argues and tests for the main effect of three institutional factors (popularity of the initiator, size of parliamentary majority, and political cues during referendum campaigns) and controls for the type of referendum and voter turnout. The analysis uses data collected from referendums and electoral databases, public opinion surveys, and newspaper articles. Results show that referendums proposed by a large parliamentary majority or with clear messages from political parties during campaign are likely to be successful.

AlkuperäiskieliEi tiedossa
Sivut905-922
Sivumäärä17
JulkaisuComparative European Politics
Vuosikerta16
Numero5
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu

Keywords

  • referendum, direct democracy, success,party cues

Viittausmuodot