Abstrakti
In clinical in-person conditions, social presence, perceived empathy, and emotional engagement are related to positive outcomes. In online settings, it is unclear how these factors affect outcomes. Here, in 10–15-minute interviews, we investigated the influence of automation. Participants (N=75) engaged in one of three possible interviews: live semi-scripted, live scripted, or video scripted. In the first two, participants communicated with a live interviewer and, in the third, with pre-recorded interviewer questions and answers. Emotion recognition software revealed that expressed joy differed between conditions (χ2(2) = 18.08, p<.001); both live conditions had higher scores (vs. video scripted). Self-rated perceived interviewer empathy also differed between conditions in the same way (F[2, 72] = 9.445, p<0.001). We found a positive correlation between perceived empathy and expressed joy (r=.35; p<.01). In sum, automatized interviews differed in perceived empathy and expressed emotion compared with live interviews.
| Alkuperäiskieli | Englanti |
|---|---|
| Artikkeli | e0323490 |
| Julkaisu | PLOS ONE |
| Vuosikerta | 20 |
| Numero | 5 May |
| DOI - pysyväislinkit | |
| Tila | Julkaistu - toukok. 2025 |
| OKM-julkaisutyyppi | A1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu |
Sormenjälki
Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Emotional engagement and perceived empathy in live vs. automated psychological interviews'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.Viittausmuodot
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver