Suffering and Misery in History is Not a Tragic Story: The Ethical Education of Seeing Differences between Narratives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article brings out ethical aspects arising in Plato’s classical critique of narrative and imitative art in The Republic, especially when it comes to reading stories about the past. Socrates’s and Glaucon’s most important suggestion, I argue, is to cultivate an ethical consciousness where one ought to see the distinctions between how the real and the imaginary in narratives are to be conceived, and what that insight ethically demands of the reader. Taken as an ethical insight for the reader when engaging in narrative understanding, this should be to resist the temptation to think that past suffering and misery as told in a story can be read analogously to narratives having a tragic plot. The article clarifies the meaning of Plato’s critique through the ideas of Simone Weil, Emmanuel Lévinas and Iris Murdoch. These existential moral philosophers work towards having an ethical consciousness in one’s personal relationship with stories of our lifeworld.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Curriculum Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Suffering and Misery in History is Not a Tragic Story: The Ethical Education of Seeing Differences between Narratives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this