‘Not enough’: Certainty and Doubt in Exploring the Grammar of ‘Woman’

Camilla Kronqvist*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Danièle Moyal-Sharrock and Constantine Sandis have suggested that our sense of being ‘women’ (and ‘men’) can be elucidated by thinking of it as an animal certainty. The suggestion is helpful in resisting the notion that ‘being woman’ can be modelled either on the idea of indubitable first-person knowledge of one’s inner self or of a third person’s unquestionable knowledge of one’s body. One’s being woman is manifested in one’s ways of acting and reacting; it constitutes a mode of being, which cannot be given further justification. Nevertheless, I argue that the emphasis on certainty may render the possible doubts an individual may entertain about being a woman at different stages and in different contexts of their life opaque. It may also obscure the philosophical analysis of what thinking of certainty with Wittgenstein may offer to the understanding of ‘woman’, since for him the exploration of meaningful and impossible forms of doubt always ran parallel to his thinking on certainty. Considering everyday examples of certainty and doubts in being a woman, I therefore discuss the dialectic between certainty and doubt in the constitution of being ‘a woman’, giving special attention to the significance of second person assertions and comments for the first person’s experience of being or not being a woman or not being ‘woman enough’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-143
Number of pages19
JournalWittgenstein-Studien
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Not enough’: Certainty and Doubt in Exploring the Grammar of ‘Woman’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this