TY - JOUR
T1 - Nitrogen stocks and flows in an acid sulfate soil
AU - Yli-Halla, Markku
AU - Virtanen, Seija
AU - Regina, Kristiina
AU - Österholm, Peter
AU - Ehnvall, Betty
AU - Uusi-Kämppä, Jaana
N1 - Funding Information:
The experimental field was established and the study started during the EU-Life+ project CATERMASS (2010–2012) (LIFE08ENV/FIN/000609), and continued within the projects BEFCASS (2013–2015), financed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and VIMLA (2015–2018), financed by the EU Botnia-Atlantica Interreg program. This work was also supported by the Oiva Kuusisto Foundation (grants 20.4.2009 and 5.5.2015), Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry, and Drainage Foundation sr. We thank Mr. Rainer Rosendahl for his valuable work during the project, and the personnel at the ELY Centre in Vaasa and the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) for their contribution in the data collection and analyses. Special thanks to farmers Arne Lervik, Tom Backlund, and Stefan Östman for their cooperation in the field.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Besides causing acidification, acid sulfate (AS) soils contain large nitrogen (N) stocks and are a potential source of N loading to waters and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. We quantified the stocks and flows of N, including crop yields, N leaching, and N2O emissions, in a cultivated AS soil in western Finland. We also investigated whether controlled drainage (CD) and sub-irrigation (CDI) to keep the sulfidic horizons inundated can alleviate N losses. Total N stock at 0–100 cm (19.5 Mg ha−1) was smaller than at 100–200 cm (26.6 Mg ha−1), and the mineral N stock was largest below 170 cm. Annual N leaching (31–91 kg N ha−1) plus N in harvested grain (74–122 kg N ha−1) was 148% (range 118–189%) of N applied in fertilizers (90–125 kg N ha−1) in 2011–2017, suggesting substantial N supply from soil reserves. Annual emissions of N2O measured during 2 years were 8–28 kg N ha−1. The most probable reasons for high N2O emission rates in AS soils are concomitant large mineral N pools with fluctuating redox conditions and low pH in the oxidized subsoil, all favoring formation of N2O in nitrification and denitrification. Although the groundwater level was higher in CD and CDI than in conventional drainage, N load and crop offtake did not differ between the drainage methods, but there were differences in emissions. Nitrogen flows to the atmosphere and drainage water were clearly larger than those in non-AS mineral soils indicating that AS soils are potential hotspots of environmental impacts.
AB - Besides causing acidification, acid sulfate (AS) soils contain large nitrogen (N) stocks and are a potential source of N loading to waters and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. We quantified the stocks and flows of N, including crop yields, N leaching, and N2O emissions, in a cultivated AS soil in western Finland. We also investigated whether controlled drainage (CD) and sub-irrigation (CDI) to keep the sulfidic horizons inundated can alleviate N losses. Total N stock at 0–100 cm (19.5 Mg ha−1) was smaller than at 100–200 cm (26.6 Mg ha−1), and the mineral N stock was largest below 170 cm. Annual N leaching (31–91 kg N ha−1) plus N in harvested grain (74–122 kg N ha−1) was 148% (range 118–189%) of N applied in fertilizers (90–125 kg N ha−1) in 2011–2017, suggesting substantial N supply from soil reserves. Annual emissions of N2O measured during 2 years were 8–28 kg N ha−1. The most probable reasons for high N2O emission rates in AS soils are concomitant large mineral N pools with fluctuating redox conditions and low pH in the oxidized subsoil, all favoring formation of N2O in nitrification and denitrification. Although the groundwater level was higher in CD and CDI than in conventional drainage, N load and crop offtake did not differ between the drainage methods, but there were differences in emissions. Nitrogen flows to the atmosphere and drainage water were clearly larger than those in non-AS mineral soils indicating that AS soils are potential hotspots of environmental impacts.
KW - Acid sulfate soil
KW - Controlled drainage
KW - N leaching
KW - Nitrous oxide emissions
KW - Sub-irrigation
KW - Nitrogen
KW - Acid sulfate soil
KW - flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095586083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10661-020-08697-1
DO - 10.1007/s10661-020-08697-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33156467
AN - SCOPUS:85095586083
SN - 0167-6369
VL - 192
JO - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
JF - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
IS - 12
M1 - 751
ER -