Kinetics of reactions between chlorine and the cyanobacterial toxins microcystins

Juan L. Acero*, Eva Rodriguez, Jussi Meriluoto

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

137 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Blooms of cyanobacteria can give rise to the production of toxins which contaminate drinking water sources. Among the oxidants and disinfectants typically applied in waterworks, chlorine has been found to be effective for the degradation of microcystins. In the present study, unknown second-order rate constants for the reactions of microcystin-LR (MC-LR), -RR and -YR with chlorine were determined over a wide pH range. It was found that an increase of pH has a negative effect on the microcystin degradation rate. Apparent second-order rate constant for the chlorination of MC-LR at 20°C varied from 475 M -1 s-1 at pH 4.8 to 9.8 M-1 s-1 at pH 8.8. From these apparent second-order rate constants, rate constants for the reactions of MC-LR with hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypochlorite (ClO -) were evaluated. Half-life times ranged from minutes at pH 6 to 1 h at pH 8 for a constant residual chlorine concentration of 1.0-0.5 mg l -1, typical of oxidation pre-treatment and final disinfection. Similar reactivity with chlorine was found for MC-RR and MC-YR. Therefore, chlorination is a feasible option for microcystin degradation during oxidation and disinfection processes, and can be applied in drinking water treatment in case of cyanobacterial toxin risk if the pH is kept below 8.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1628-1638
Number of pages11
JournalWater Research
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Chloramine
  • Chlorine
  • Cyanobacteria
  • Drinking water chlorination
  • Microcystins
  • Rate constants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kinetics of reactions between chlorine and the cyanobacterial toxins microcystins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this