(In)credibly Queer? Assessments of Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation

Hedayat Selim, Pia Lindblad, Johanna Vanto, Jenny Skrifvars, Anne Alvesalo-Kuusi, Julia Korkman, Elina Pirjatanniemi, Jan Antfolk*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Queer asylum-seekers should be given an opportunity to have their claim evaluated in a fair and unbiased manner. Despite this, research shows they risk having their claims rejected based on stereotypes about sexual minorities. In the present study, we investigated how the Finnish Immigration Service evaluated credibility in asylum claims lodged by sexual minorities. Methods: We analysed 68 negative asylum decisions to assess the arguments made to reject the asylum claim. To do this, we developed a detailed coding scheme to investigate the specific themes and credibility indicators cited in the asylum decisions. Results: We found that the asylum claims were most often rejected because the applicant's account of their sexual orientation was not found to be sufficiently detailed, consistent, or plausible. Officials appeared to hold assumptions around sexual identity development and interpersonal relationships that are partially unsupported by established psychological science. Conclusions: Assessments of SOGI claims would benefit from a greater consideration of the factors affecting queer asylum applicants' ability to describe their claims, including cross-cultural differences in understandings of sexuality, variability in human behaviour, and practical barriers within the asylum procedure.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Early online date3 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Nov 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(In)credibly Queer? Assessments of Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this