Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gallionella and Sulfuricella populations are dominant during the transition of boreal potential to actual acid sulfate soils

  • Eva Högfors-Rönnholm*
  • , Daniel Lundin
  • , Diego Brambilla
  • , Stephan Christel
  • , Margarita Lopez-Fernandez
  • , Tom Lillhonga
  • , Sten Engblom
  • , Peter Österholm
  • , Mark Dopson
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Acid sulfate soils release metal laden, acidic waters that affect the environment, buildings, and human health. In this study, 16S rRNA gene amplicons, metagenomes, and metatranscriptomes all demonstrated distinct microbial communities and activities in the unoxidized potential acid sulfate soil, the overlying transition zone, and uppermost oxidized actual acid sulfate soil. Assembled genomes and mRNA transcripts also suggested abundant oxidized acid sulfate soil populations that aligned within the Gammaproteobacteria and Terracidiphilus. In contrast, potentially acid tolerant or moderately acidophilic iron oxidizing Gallionella and sulfur metabolizing Sulfuricella dominated the transition zone during catalysis of metal sulfide oxidation to form acid sulfate soil. Finally, anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate, sulfate, and ferric reduction were suggested to occur in the reduced parent sediments. In conclusion, despite comparable metal sulfide dissolution processes e.g., biomining, Gallionella and Sulfuricella dominated the community and activities during conversion of potential to actual acid sulfate soils.

Original languageEnglish
Article number304
JournalCommunications Earth and Environment
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

A portion of this research was performed under the Facilities Integrating Collaborations for User Science (FICUS) initiative and used resources at the DOE Joint Genome Institute and the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, which are DOE Office of Science User Facilities. Both facilities are sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research and operated under Contract Nos. DE-AC02-05CH11231 (JGI) and DE-AC05-76RL01830 (EMSL). E.H.-R. acknowledges the Nessling Foundation (grant number 201700273 and 201800502) and Svensk-Österbottniska Samfundet r.f. (grant number 18/0604) for financial support. E.H.-R. and S.E. further acknowledge the financial support by the European Regional Development Fund via the Interreg Botnia-Atlantica program to the project “Sustainable treatment of coastal deposited sulfide soils (STASIS).” M.D. acknowledges The Swedish Research Council Formas (grant number 2018-00760) and the Geological Survey of Sweden (grant number 36-1878/2017) for financial support. M.D further acknowledges the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) and the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI). The computations were enabled by resources (SNIC 2021/22-628) provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX at Uppsala University partially funded by the Swedish Research Council through grant agreement no. 2018-05973. D.L. and D.B. acknowledges the Swedish Research Council infrastructure project Biodiversity Atlas Sweden (VR, grant number 2017-00688) and the marine strategic research environment EcoChange (Formas) for financial support. Jussi Hyvönen is gratefully acknowledged for geochemical analyses. A portion of this research was performed under the Facilities Integrating Collaborations for User Science (FICUS) initiative and used resources at the DOE Joint Genome Institute and the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, which are DOE Office of Science User Facilities. Both facilities are sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research and operated under Contract Nos. DE-AC02-05CH11231 (JGI) and DE-AC05-76RL01830 (EMSL). E.H.-R. acknowledges the Nessling Foundation (grant number 201700273 and 201800502) and Svensk-Österbottniska Samfundet r.f. (grant number 18/0604) for financial support. E.H.-R. and S.E. further acknowledge the financial support by the European Regional Development Fund via the Interreg Botnia-Atlantica program to the project “Sustainable treatment of coastal deposited sulfide soils (STASIS).” M.D. acknowledges The Swedish Research Council Formas (grant number 2018-00760) and the Geological Survey of Sweden (grant number 36-1878/2017) for financial support. M.D further acknowledges the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) and the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI). The computations were enabled by resources (SNIC 2021/22-628) provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX at Uppsala University partially funded by the Swedish Research Council through grant agreement no. 2018-05973. D.L. and D.B. acknowledges the Swedish Research Council infrastructure project Biodiversity Atlas Sweden (VR, grant number 2017-00688) and the marine strategic research environment EcoChange (Formas) for financial support. Jussi Hyvönen is gratefully acknowledged for geochemical analyses.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gallionella and Sulfuricella populations are dominant during the transition of boreal potential to actual acid sulfate soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this