Family networks of scholarly households in Turku during the turn of the eighteenth-century

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter, Robin Engblom studies early modern scholarly networks from a household and family perspective by exploring how knowledge, resources, and duties were distributed within and between households in scholarly families. Relying on correspondence as source material, Engblom's case study focuses on the family and household of the Swedish Bishop and Professor, Johannes Gezelius junior, with an emphasis on cooperation between households within larger family networks. The study employs the notion of the family university to explore what impact households had on shaping the social networks of scholarly families, how scholarly families employed their networks, and what explicit benefits the networks provided for the households of scholarly families. The chapter concludes that many of the features that characterised the family university, such as strategic marriages between professors' families and the forming of reciprocal relationships, were conceived within scholarly households. The household members thus played an important role in strengthening the ties between families. Social networks were often utilised, as within noble families, through cultural kinship to gain economic benefits or increase influence within professional institutions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAcademic Households in Early Modern Northern Europe
EditorsMari Välimäki
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages114-134
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-032-68728-5
ISBN (Print)978-1-032-68725-4, 978-1-032-68727-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
MoE publication typeA3 Part of a book or another research book

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Early Modern History
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Family networks of scholarly households in Turku during the turn of the eighteenth-century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this