Abstract
However, results showed that the language used included long and complex sentences, multiple questions before the child was allowed to answer, as well as unclear references to persons and situations. These were all associated with fewer details from the child and they also raise concerns about the credibility of the information gained in these interviews. Interviewers had some age sensitivity; all categories occurred more frequently in interviews with older (6-8 years) than with younger children (3-5 years), except for the unclear references. The interviewers often introduced the topic of abuse in a leading yet unclear way, and the interviews were characterized by fluctuation between on- and off-topic discussions, adding to the concerns. The issue of how to more properly and age-appropriately conduct CSA interviews needs further attention, both within research and in attempts to translate research findings into clinical practice.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41–60 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Psychology, Crime and Law |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- child sexual abuse investigations
- forensic child interviews
- interview structure
- interviewer utterances
- language use in interviews
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver