TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and economic evaluation of energy-saving industrial distillation processes for separating close-boiling cyclohexanone-cyclohexanol mixture
AU - Wang, Hongdan
AU - Cui, Chengtian
AU - Lyu, Hao
AU - Sun, Jinsheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/3/18
Y1 - 2019/3/18
N2 - In this study, several heat-integrated distillation processes are compared to separate the close-boiling cyclohexanone (CHON)-cyclohexanol (CHXA) for improving energy efficiency. A 4-column scheme, including two light ends columns in DRP (distillation with recycle process), a CHON column and a CHXA column, is introduced as the prototype scheme. To make improvement, light and heavy split DRP – are compared for energy optimization upon the prototype. The light split DRP turns out to be superior and thus used for subsequent steps. Four heat-integrated schemes including double-effect distillation (DED), heat pump assisted distillation (HPAD), DED plus HPAD (DEHP) and double HPAD (DHPAD) are sequentially suggested and evaluated based on total annualized cost (TAC). The results show TAC reductions from the prototype of 32.2%, 23.6%, 29.2% and 10.8% for DED, HPAD, DEHP and DHPAD, respectively. The DED scheme requires the lowest TAC due to the 48.4% operating cost and 8% capital cost saving, whereas the DEHP scheme has the lowest 56.3% operating cost reduction with 11.1% more capital investment. The line of thinking in this work will benefit in other close-boiling systems for higher energetic efficiency and economic profit.
AB - In this study, several heat-integrated distillation processes are compared to separate the close-boiling cyclohexanone (CHON)-cyclohexanol (CHXA) for improving energy efficiency. A 4-column scheme, including two light ends columns in DRP (distillation with recycle process), a CHON column and a CHXA column, is introduced as the prototype scheme. To make improvement, light and heavy split DRP – are compared for energy optimization upon the prototype. The light split DRP turns out to be superior and thus used for subsequent steps. Four heat-integrated schemes including double-effect distillation (DED), heat pump assisted distillation (HPAD), DED plus HPAD (DEHP) and double HPAD (DHPAD) are sequentially suggested and evaluated based on total annualized cost (TAC). The results show TAC reductions from the prototype of 32.2%, 23.6%, 29.2% and 10.8% for DED, HPAD, DEHP and DHPAD, respectively. The DED scheme requires the lowest TAC due to the 48.4% operating cost and 8% capital cost saving, whereas the DEHP scheme has the lowest 56.3% operating cost reduction with 11.1% more capital investment. The line of thinking in this work will benefit in other close-boiling systems for higher energetic efficiency and economic profit.
KW - Cyclohexanone-cyclohexanol
KW - Distillation with recycle process
KW - Double-effect
KW - Economic evaluation
KW - Heat pump
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054221125
U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.025
DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054221125
SN - 1383-5866
VL - 211
SP - 279
EP - 289
JO - Separation and Purification Technology
JF - Separation and Purification Technology
ER -