Contaminants of emerging concern in an endangered population of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in the Baltic Sea

Amalie V. Ask, Veerle L. B. Jaspers, Junjie Zhang, Alexandros G. Asimakopoulos, Sunniva H. Froyland, Juho Jolkkonen, Wasique Z. Prian, Nora M. Wilson, Christian Sonne, Martin Hansen, Markus Öst, Sanna Koivisto, Tapio Eeva, Farshad S. Vakili, Céline Arzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) are ubiquitous in aquatic environments and pose a range of biological effects including endocrine disruption. Yet, knowledge of their occurrence in wildlife including seabirds remains scarce. We investigated the occurrence of selected bisphenols, benzophenones, phthalate metabolites, benzotriazoles, benzothiazoles, parabens, triclosan, and triclocarban in plasma of 18 breeding female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) from an endangered population in the Baltic Sea as most of these CECs have never before been examined in eiders. We sampled blood at the start (T1) and end (T2) of incubation to investigate concentration changes during incubation. As early- and late-breeding eiders tend to differ in how they finance reproduction (local vs stored nutrient reserves), we compared early and late breeders to assess whether CEC concentrations differed by breeding phenology. Of the 58 targeted CECs, 21 were detected in at least one female, with bisphenol A (BPA) and benzophenone-3 (BzP-3) occurring most frequently (T1: 78% and 61%; T2: 61% and 67%, respectively), while mono(2-ethyl-1-hexyl) phthalate (mEHP), BPA, and monoethyl phthalate (mEP) were detected in the highest concentrations (median concentrations 27.1, 12.7, and 11.2 ng/g wet weight, respectively, at T1). No CEC concentrations differed between early and late incubation. Late breeders had significantly higher concentrations of BzP-3, monomethyl phthalate (mMP), and mEP during early incubation (4.55 vs 1.24 ng/g ww, 7.05 vs 3.52, and 11.2 vs < limit of detection (LOD), respectively) and significantly higher concentrations of mMP and mEP during late incubation (6.16 vs <LOD and 7.51 vs <LOD, respectively) than early breeders. We showed that early and late breeders exhibited differential exposure to CECs. Our results support the need for long-term monitoring of CECs in eiders. Furthermore, it is important to examine these CECs in the eiders’ prey species from their wintering and breeding grounds.

Original languageEnglish
Article number125409
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume365
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2025
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

We thank the Wilson family on Bengtsk\u00E4r for their help and assistance in accommodating us for the fieldwork and Stefan Bj\u00F6rkman and Turkan Oztas for their participation in the fieldwork. We thank Ville Aukee and Emil Egede Fr\u00F8kj\u00E6r for their help shipping samples and we are grateful to Svend Erik Garbus and Kim Jaatinen for sharing their experiences of eider fieldwork. From the Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency, Eeva Rissanen, Tomi Kaartinen, and Virpi Virtanen kindly provided feedback on the manuscript, and we thank Anu Matilainen for providing the KemiDigi information. We are grateful to Shane Ask for proofreading. The manuscript was greatly improved thanks to comments from three anonymous reviewers. Markus \u00D6st's participation in this study was supported by the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (grant nos. 177733 and 188437). Finally, we thank the Research Council of Finland (grant nos. 336261 and 333400) and Turku University Foundation for funding the research. We thank the Wilson family on Bengtsk\u00E4r for their help and assistance in accommodating us for the fieldwork and Stefan Bj\u00F6rkman and Turkan Oztas for their participation in the fieldwork. We thank Ville Aukee and Emil Egede Fr\u00F8kj\u00E6r for their help shipping samples and we are grateful to Svend Erik Garbus and Kim Jaatinen for sharing their experiences of eider fieldwork. From the Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency, Eeva Rissanen, Tomi Kaartinen, and Virpi Virtanen kindly provided feedback on the manuscript, and we thank Anu Matilainen for providing the KemiDigi information. We are grateful to Shane Ask for proofreading. The manuscript was greatly improved thanks to comments from three anonymous reviewers. Markus \u00D6st\u2019s participation in this study was supported by the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (grant nos. 177733 and 188437). Finally, we thank the Research Council of Finland (grant nos. 336261 and 333400) and Turku University Foundation for funding the research.

Keywords

  • Avian
  • Blood
  • Duck
  • Personal care product
  • Plasticizer
  • UV filter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contaminants of emerging concern in an endangered population of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in the Baltic Sea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this