Cognitive Mapping Approach Analyzing Societal Decision-Making

Malin Brännback, Pentti Malaska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cognitive mapping (CM) approach is reviewed, and the method is applied in analyzing an important case of societal decision-making. It is shown that CM is an effective way of representing argumentation, consequences, and the linkage between the concepts. The method integrates causal modelling and rational choice theory with parts of cognitive psychology. CM allows for a systematic arguing of issues. The decision-making problem described here concerns building a new nuclear power plant in Finland. There occurred strong proponents representing mainly the industry and technocratic and engineering experts, and an equally strong resistance represented by ordinary citizens, parliamentarians, and experts. The argumentation went ten years pro and cons before the parliament in 1993 decided against building the proposed nuclear power plant. It gives an ideal case to study the argumentation and contradictions there in as a whole by developing and applying a cognitive mapping approach. © 1995, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-245
Number of pages15
JournalWorld Futures
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • cognitive mapping nuclear power
  • validation
  • value contradiction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive Mapping Approach Analyzing Societal Decision-Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this