Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling

U Kaantee, Ron Zevenhoven, R Backman, Mikko Hupa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    111 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Energy costs and environmental standards encouraged cement manufacturers world-wide to evaluate to what extent conventional fuels can be replaced by alternative fuels, i.e., processed waste materials. Clinker burning is well suited for various alternative fuels. In order select a suitable alternative fuel, a commercial modelling tool (ASPEN PLUS (R)) is used to model the four-stage pre-heater kiln system of a full-scale cement plant (clinker production similar to2900 tons/day), using petcoke as fuel. The goal is to optimise process control and alternative fuel consumption, while maintaining clinker product quality. Calculations with varying amounts of different fuels are compared with a reference case. The dependence of process performance on the amount of combustion air is clearly demonstrated and the energy demand of the process could be predicted for varying fuel mixes.
    Original languageUndefined/Unknown
    Pages (from-to)293–301
    Number of pages9
    JournalFuel Processing Technology
    Volume85
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • alternative fuels
    • cement clinker
    • process modelling

    Cite this