Breaking-up and breaking the norm: intergenerational divorce transmission among two ethnolinguistic groups

Caroline Uggla*, Jan Saarela

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Individuals who experience divorce in childhood are more likely to divorce themselves as adults. Notably, the magnitude of the intergenerational divorce transmission is stronger for groups among whom divorce is rare. This transmission may reflect differences in mating strategies passed from parent to child, or differences in cultural norms between groups. Sociologists and demographers have struggled to disentangle socioeconomic and cultural factors, because groups that are less wealthy also tend to have higher divorce rates. We use data from Finland, where two native ethnolinguistic groups with comparable socioeconomic characteristics - but different divorce risks - live side by side; Swedish speakers and Finnish speakers. Using register data on the entire Finnish population (N=554, 337 couples 1987-2020), we examine separation risk as a function of parental divorce. Data suggest that the intergenerational transmission is greater among Swedish speakers, who have an overall lower separation rate. Group differences in separation risk persist even after controlling for socioeconomic factors and each partner's experience of parental divorce. Notably, Finnish-speaking couples who reside in Swedish-dominated areas have both somewhat lower separation risk, and higher intergenerational transmission than their peers in Finnish-dominated areas. These results point to a cultural transmission of separation, beyond strong socioeconomic factors.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14
Number of pages17
JournalEvolutionary Human Sciences
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2025
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking-up and breaking the norm: intergenerational divorce transmission among two ethnolinguistic groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this