TY - GEN
T1 - Boosting the elongation potential of paper by mechanical refining and additives
AU - Strand, Anders
AU - Kouko, Jarmo
AU - Oksanen, Antti
AU - Salminen, Kristian
AU - Ketola, Annika
AU - Retulainen, Elias
AU - Sundberg, Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by the Tappi Press.All right Reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The drying technique will severely affect paper properties. In this work, the main differences between restrained drying and unrestrained drying on paper properties were identified. The mechanical properties of paper were studied as a function of low-consistency mechanical refining energy, wet-end additions of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with cationic starches, as well as spray addition of alginate, chitosan and cationic guar gum. Low-consistency refining: After restrained drying, the tensile index and tensile stiffness increased with increasing refining energy, but the elongation at break was severely limited. After unrestrained drying, the elongation at break increased linearly with increasing refining energy. However, unrestrained drying also resulted in significantly lower tensile index and tensile stiffness values. Wet-end addition: After restrained drying, the largest increases in tensile index and stiffness were obtained by sequential wet-end addition of CMC and cationic starches. Certain combinations could mitigate all of the decrease in tensile index from unrestrained drying, while maintaining the distinctively high elongation potential of the paper. Wet-end addition of CMC and cationic starches could mitigate some of the decrease in tensile stiffness, but not completely. Spray addition: Spray addition of alginate, chitosan, or cationic guar gum increased the tensile index after both restrained and unrestrained drying. Spray addition of alginate resulted in significant increases in elongation at break and 2D formability of the handsheets after unrestrained drying. After restrained drying, the tensile stiffness increased after spray addition of all of the different polysaccharides. After unrestrained drying, however, the stifthess was unaffected by all of the tested polysaccharide spray additions. The main differences between restrained and unrestrained drying on paper properties were revealed. Restrained drying resulted in very stiff paper after prolonged refining, with certain wet-end additions, or with spray additions of polysaccharides, but the elongation potential of the fiber network was quite limited. Unrestrained drying resulted in high elongation at break values as a result of prolonged refining, with certain wet-end additions, or sprayaddition of polysaccharides, but the tensile stiffness was very limited. It was concluded that the same pulp treatment/additives will increase either stiffness or stretch depending on the drying technique, but both properties could not be maximizedsimultaneously.
AB - The drying technique will severely affect paper properties. In this work, the main differences between restrained drying and unrestrained drying on paper properties were identified. The mechanical properties of paper were studied as a function of low-consistency mechanical refining energy, wet-end additions of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with cationic starches, as well as spray addition of alginate, chitosan and cationic guar gum. Low-consistency refining: After restrained drying, the tensile index and tensile stiffness increased with increasing refining energy, but the elongation at break was severely limited. After unrestrained drying, the elongation at break increased linearly with increasing refining energy. However, unrestrained drying also resulted in significantly lower tensile index and tensile stiffness values. Wet-end addition: After restrained drying, the largest increases in tensile index and stiffness were obtained by sequential wet-end addition of CMC and cationic starches. Certain combinations could mitigate all of the decrease in tensile index from unrestrained drying, while maintaining the distinctively high elongation potential of the paper. Wet-end addition of CMC and cationic starches could mitigate some of the decrease in tensile stiffness, but not completely. Spray addition: Spray addition of alginate, chitosan, or cationic guar gum increased the tensile index after both restrained and unrestrained drying. Spray addition of alginate resulted in significant increases in elongation at break and 2D formability of the handsheets after unrestrained drying. After restrained drying, the tensile stiffness increased after spray addition of all of the different polysaccharides. After unrestrained drying, however, the stifthess was unaffected by all of the tested polysaccharide spray additions. The main differences between restrained and unrestrained drying on paper properties were revealed. Restrained drying resulted in very stiff paper after prolonged refining, with certain wet-end additions, or with spray additions of polysaccharides, but the elongation potential of the fiber network was quite limited. Unrestrained drying resulted in high elongation at break values as a result of prolonged refining, with certain wet-end additions, or sprayaddition of polysaccharides, but the tensile stiffness was very limited. It was concluded that the same pulp treatment/additives will increase either stiffness or stretch depending on the drying technique, but both properties could not be maximizedsimultaneously.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060366390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Published conference proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85060366390
T3 - Paper Conference and Trade Show, PaperCon 2018
SP - 761
EP - 770
BT - Paper Conference and Trade Show, PaperCon 2018
PB - TAPPI Press
T2 - TAPPI Paper Conference and Trade Show, PaperCon 2018
Y2 - 15 April 2018 through 18 April 2018
ER -