Acid sulfate soil mapping in western Finland: How to work with imbalanced datasets and machine learning

Virginia Estévez*, Stefan Mattbäck, Anton Boman, Pauliina Liwata-Kenttälä, Kaj Mikael Björk, Peter Österholm

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Imbalanced datasets are one of the main challenges in digital soil mapping. For these datasets, machine learning techniques commonly overestimate the majority classes and underestimate the minority ones. In general, this generates maps with poor precision and unrealistic results. Considering these maps for land use decision-making can have dire consequences. This is the case of acid sulfate (AS) soils, a type of harmful soil that can generate serious environmental damage when drained in agricultural or forestry activities. Therefore, it is necessary to create high-precision maps to avoid environmental damage. Although most soil class datasets in nature are imbalanced, this problem has hardly been studied. One of the main objectives of this work is the evaluation of different techniques to address the problem of imbalanced datasets. The methods considered to balance the dataset are an undersampling technique, the addition of more samples, and the combination of both. For increasing the number of samples from the minority class, we develop a new technique by creating artificial samples from the quaternary geological map. The method used for the modeling is Random Forest, one of the best methods for the classification of AS soils. Balancing the dataset improves the performance of the model in all the studied cases, where the values of the metrics for both classes are above 80%. The consideration of artificial non-AS soil samples improves the prediction of the model for the AS soils. Furthermore, we create AS soil probability maps for the four balanced datasets and the imbalanced dataset. The modeled AS soil probability maps created from the balanced datasets have high precision. A detailed comparison between the maps is made. The predictions of some of these maps match between 75%–80% of the study area. In addition, the extent of the AS soils obtained in all the cases is compared with the extent of the AS soils in the conventionally produced occurrence map. The good results of this study confirm the importance of balancing the dataset to improve the prediction and classification of AS soils.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116916
JournalGeoderma
Volume447
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Acid sulfate soils
  • Digital soil mapping
  • Imbalanced dataset
  • Machine learning
  • Random Forest
  • Resampling techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acid sulfate soil mapping in western Finland: How to work with imbalanced datasets and machine learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this