Description
AbstractCharlotta Hilli, Åbo Akademi University
This paper investigates entanglements of space and student online collaboration to understand processes of Bildung. It is theoretically informed by posthuman Bildung that studies entanglements of doings/knowledge/spaces. Bildung is a German concept changing with time and it is found around the world under different names (Horlacher, 2016). Bildung is a never ending personal process - open, reflective, intellectual, and moral - interlinked with culture, other people, and efforts for a better world (Uljens, 2003). Most researchers agree Bildung is a transformative process where the I/the Self meets the Other, which can be, other people, texts, materials that make the I/the Self expand and reach new levels of reflections (Wiberg, 2018). Carol Taylor (2017) suggests posthumanist Bildung offers analytic tools to understand the entanglements of being/knowing/doing. Taylor (2017, p. 428) argues that “all learning is spatially located—it happens somewhere—and that somewhere is an intimate if unspoken and unacknowledged part of our bodily experience of education.” The space for learning has agency in a posthuman sense.
The case discussed is an online course in higher education. The design of the learning space is an important material-discursive practice to consider (Barad, 2007). In distance education, the online space can offer interfaces for transformations of Bildung. There are also issues of disconnections that need to be considered when participants only meet asynchronously online. Delayed written communication challenged the participants to cognitively and ethically consider the course content and the group members. The design of the learning space was entangled with a risk of information overload and feelings of confusion or frustration among participants. Entanglements of being/knowing/doing are ways to understand online collaboration as deeply entwined with the space for learning.
References:
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Horlacher, R. (2016). The Educated Subject and the German Concept of Bildung. A Comparative Cultural History. Oxon: Routledge.
Taylor, C. A. (2017). Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 74 (3), 419–435. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9994-y
Uljens, M. (2003). The Idea of a Universal Theory of Education - and Impossible but Necessary Project? In L. Løvlie, K. P. Mortensen and S.E. Nordenbo (Eds.), Educating Humanity. Bildung in Postmodernity (pp. 37–59). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
Wiberg, M. (2018). Den teoretiske pædagogiks bidrag til empirisk forskning i dannelse: kan man forske i dannelse? In A. von Oettingen (Ed.), Empirisk dannelsesforskning : mellem teori, empiri og praksis (pp. 69–89). Hans Reitzels Forlag: København.
Additionaldescription
Funded by Gustaf Packaléns MindefondPeriod | 7 Oct 2020 |
---|---|
Event title | Posthumanism 2020 |
Event type | Conference |
Location | Aarhus, DenmarkShow on map |
Related content
-
Publications
-
Entanglements of Posthumanist Bildung in Virtual Learning Environments
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
-
Student virtual collaboration as messy entanglements of Bildung
Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Professional
-
Att tänka med posthumanistisk bildningsteori i virtuella lärmiljöer: Etiska relationer och kommunikation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review