Patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity and assess nursing staffing resources in home health care: A scoping review

A2 Granskningsartikel, litteraturgranskning, systematisk granskning

Interna författare/redaktörer

Publikationens författare: Jill Flo, Bjørg Landmark, Siri Tønnessen, Lisbeth Fagerström
Förläggare: Elsevier
Publiceringsår: 2019
Tidskrift: International Journal of Nursing Studies
Tidskriftsakronym: Int J Nurs Stud
Volym: 99
Artikelns första sida, sidnummer: 1
Artikelns sista sida, sidnummer: 12
Antal sidor: 12
ISSN: 0020-7489
eISSN: 1873-491X


Objectives: To identify the patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity in the assessment of nursing staffing resources currently used in home health care, with a special emphasis on validity, reliability and staff allocation.Design: Scoping review of internationally published and grey literature, based on a methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley.Data sources: Searches of the electronic databases Cinahl, Medline, Embase and SweMed, the websites Google and Google Scholar and hand searches of reference lists occurred. Eligibility criteria included (A) a focus on patient classification systems measuring nursing intensity and workload in home health care and (B) published in English between January 2007 and March 2019. In level one testing two team members screened titles and abstracts, in level two testing two team members determined which papers should undergo a full text review. Data were extracted using structured extraction by one team member and verified by two other members.Results: Thirteen peer-reviewed articles and grey literature documents were identified, from Canada, Ireland, the UK, the USA, Scotland, Turkey and the Netherlands. Four patient classification systems had been tested for both validity and reliability. Validity was tested through face validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity or content validity index. Reliability was tested through stability, internal consistency, observer agreement or inter rater reliability. One patient classification system had been tested only for reliability, through interrater reliability and observer agreement. Two patient classification systems had been evaluated through summative evaluation; one qualitatively through focus group interviews and one through semi-structured interviews. Only one patient classification system had been validity and reliability tested and evaluated. Overall, the patient classification systems in the included papers (13) were considered to have benefits and to be appropriate for the measurement of patients' needs, workload and allocation of staff, although specific information was not always given.Conclusion: Little has been published on validity or reliability tested patient classification systems linked to staffing allocation in home health care in the past decade. Limited research was seen where a patient classification system was considered to be fully operational in home health care. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.


home health care, Patient classification, SYSTEM, Workload

Senast uppdaterad 2020-05-06 vid 05:05