Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer's emotional style

A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift (referentgranskad)


Interna författare/redaktörer


Publikationens författare: Santtila P, Roppola H, Runtti M, Niemi P
Förläggare: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Publiceringsår: 2000
Tidskrift: Psychology, Crime and Law
Tidskriftsakronym: PSYCHOL CRIME LAW
Volym: 6
Nummer: 3
Artikelns första sida, sidnummer: 159
Artikelns sista sida, sidnummer: 179
Antal sidor: 21
ISSN: 1068-316X


Abstrakt

The goal of the study was to determine what effects age, verbal ability (assessed with WISC-R Vocabulary), and interviewer's emotional style would have on the occurrence of Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) criteria. Children (N = 68) from three different age-groups (7-8, 10-11, and 13-14 years) made both a true and a false statement concerning a mildly traumatic event. The correct classification Tate was 66%. Age and verbal ability were found to increase the occurrence of some of the CBCA criteria irrespective of the truthfulness of the statements. Also, different criteria differentiated between true and false statements in different age groups. Interviewer behaviour also affected the occurrence of the criteria. It is concluded that the CBCA should not be used in court proceedings in its present form.


Nyckelord

age, CBCA, child witness, interviewer style, verbal ability

Senast uppdaterad 2020-22-02 vid 06:10